Watch Out! Here Come the Election Manipulators!
You read the headline! That’s great!
Let’s cut to the chase, shall we?
There are several people who are
charged with the job of verifying the outcomes of elections that cling to the
mistaken notion that President #45 won the 2020 Presidential election, despite
all contentions to the contrary. These folks are termed, “election deniers”.
According to an op-ed in the Erie
Times-News cited the USA TODAY Network focusing “…on seven key states that sent
false electors saying Trump won the 2020 election – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan,
Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
“In these seven states, a candidate
is included as an election denier if they:
“Were one of the 147 members of
Congress who voted against certifying the election results or said they would
have if they were in office.
Have publicly said the 2020 election
was “rigged,” “stolen,” marred by voter fraud or otherwise illegitimate — and
have not recanted their false claim.
Or still publicly question the
results of the 2020 election, nearly two years after it has been certified.” (6)
This viewpoint seems to give a clearer
and more easily defined benchmark.
Returning to my flagrantly
click-baiting headline, a Rolling Stone investigation in 2022 found that
numerous "election deniers" - those who reject the outcome of the
2020 election despite no evidence of widespread fraud - had gained positions in
election offices nationwide. This trend raises alarms about the potential
impact on election administration and public trust in democratic processes. (1)
The proliferation of election deniers
in official roles appears to stem from a coordinated effort to place
like-minded individuals in key positions. Groups like the American First
Secretary of State Coalition have explicitly worked to elect candidates who
question the 2020 results to roles overseeing elections. Their goal is to
"restore trust" in elections, but critics argue their true aim is
gaining power over election systems. (2)
By early 2022, election deniers had
won races for Secretary of State - the top election official in many states -
in places like Nevada and Michigan. Numerous election deniers also secured
positions at county and local levels involved in managing voter rolls, staffing
polling places, and certifying results. (3)
The presence of election deniers in
these roles creates several concerns: they may use their authority to cast
doubt on legitimate election outcomes that they disagree with politically, they
could potentially interfere with election processes or certification of results,
their rhetoric may further erode public confidence in electoral systems, and They
may be more susceptible to baseless claims of fraud in future elections.
Experts emphasize that U.S. elections
remain secure and accurate overall. Multiple audits and court cases found no
evidence of significant fraud in 2020. However, having officials in place who
reject these findings threatens to undermine the perceived legitimacy of future
elections.
To address these issues, some have
called for increased training and oversight of election officials. Others
advocate for nonpartisan administration of elections to reduce political
influence. Ultimately, rebuilding public trust in electoral systems likely
requires a multifaceted approach involving education, transparency, and
safeguards against interference.
It's important to note that many
election officials across the political spectrum continue to uphold their
duties with integrity. The actions of a vocal minority should not overshadow
the dedicated work of thousands of officials and volunteers who ensure free and
fair elections.
As the United States moves toward
future elections, the presence of election deniers in positions of authority
over the process will likely remain a contentious issue. Balancing democratic
participation in election administration with the need for officials who
respect electoral outcomes presents an ongoing challenge for American
democracy.
If you are concerned about this
issue, then please contact the offices of the Secretary of State in your state.
Don’t be afraid to ask them point-blank if they believe that the Biden-Harris
Administration has won the 2020 election. Let all of your friends and family
know the outcome of that conversation. Barring that, feel free to let every one
of your friends and family on social media and in your house and neighborhood
about this issue. Please, send them a link to this article. The more people
that know the harder it will be to back-talk their involvement in this plan to
subvert the 2024 election in the Republican party. This is a clear and present
danger to our democracy.
Full disclosure: This piece was produced
with the assistance of AI computer applications. However, it has been edited
and all claims can be verified via the references listed below. I encourage
readers to consult these sources directly for the most up-to-date and
comprehensive information on this complex and evolving topic.
References:
1. Rolling Stone investigation:
"Inside the Election Denial Movement's Rush to Staff Voting Offices Across
America" by Tim Dickinson, May 2022
2. Brennan Center for Justice:
"Election Deniers' Takeover of Election Offices Raises Alarm" by
Lawrence Norden, February 2022
3. States United Democracy Center:
"Democracy Crisis in the Making" report, updated August 2022
4. Reuters: "Special Report:
Backers of Trump's false fraud claims seek to control next elections" by
Nathan Layne, September 2021
5. NPR: "Election deniers are
running to control voting. Here's how they've fared so far" by Miles
Parks, June 2022
6. Racciopi, D. (2022). How we define
an election denier. Retrieved August 2, 2024, from Erie Times-News. https://www.goerie.com/story/news/politics/2022/10/04/editors-note-how-we-define-an-election-denier/67098079007/
Comments
Post a Comment